Lasertherapie der benignen Prostatahyperplasie

Zusammenfassung

Für die Lasertherapie der benignen Prostatahyperplasie kommen verschiedene Verfahren in Betracht, die mit unterschiedlichen Lasersystemen und Applikationstechniken unterschiedliche qualitative und quantitative Effekte am Gewebe generieren, die Koagulation, Vaporisation bzw. Ablation sowie die Inzision, wobei bei entsprechender Technik eine Resektion bzw. Enukleation resultiert. Da diese Verfahren als Alternative zur transurethralen Resektion der Prostata (TURP) betrachtet werden, ist das Ziel der Lasertherapie die mit der TURP vergleichbare Besserung der Symptomatik und Lebensqualität, aber auch der maximalen Harnstrahlstärke bzw. eine Verringerung der Blasenauslassobstruktion mit geringerer Begleitmorbidität und kürzerer Krankenhausverweildauer. Die Vielzahl der zur Lasertherapie der BPH publizierten Fall-Kontroll- und randomisierten Studien zeigen heterogene Ergebnisse sowohl bezüglich der Verbesserung der subjektiven und der objektiven Miktionsparameter, als auch bezüglich der Komplikationen. Dies liegt zum einen am Laser bzw. dessen qualitativer Wirkung, zum anderen am Behandler und dem von diesem bestimmten quantitativen Effekt. Die biophysikalischen Zusammenhänge zwischen den Laserparametern und den Gewebeeffekten werden diskutiert. Die biologische Wirkung hängt nicht nur von der Eindringtiefe und der Streuung, sondern auch von anderen Parametern des Lasers ab. Für die Erzeugung von großvolumigen Koagulationsnekrosen mit Lasern des Wellenlängenbereiches von ca. 800 bis 1100 nm muss eine Karbonisation der Oberfläche vermieden werden. Für die thermische Vaporisation eignen sich z. B. der Nd:YAG-Laser mit kontaktfreier Applikation oder mit Kontaktspitzen sowie Diodenlaser verschiedener Wellenlängen. Besonders geeignet sind der KTP-Laser sowie der LBO-Laser. Auch mit dem Ho:YAG-Laser ist eine Ablation möglich. Ein Schneiden, damit Resezieren bzw. Enukleieren lässt sich ebenfalls mit verschiedenen, auch thermischen Lasersystemen. effektiver mit einem Dauerstrichlaser von ca. 2000 nm. Der Ho:YAG-Laser erreicht einen athermischen Schnitt, dessen Qualität von der Pulsenergie und dem Zeitverhalten der Laserimpulse abhängt.

Abstracts

Various procedures operating with different laser systems and application techniques are available for laser treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). They generate differing qualitative and quantitative effects in tissue such as coagulation, vaporisation or, respectively, ablation as well as incisions leading according to technique to a resection or enucleation. Since these procedures are considered as alternatives to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), the objective of laser therapy is not only to achieve, in comparison to TURP, an equivalent improvement of the symptoms and quality of life but also a maximal urinary flow strength or, respectively, a reduction of obstruction to bladder emptying with lower accompanying morbidity and shorter hospitalisation. Most of the published case control and randomised studies on laser therapy for BPH show heterogeneous results both with regard to the improvement of subjective and objective urination parameters as well to complications. This is due, on the one hand, to the laser or its qualitative action and, on the other hand, to the operator and the resulting specific quantitative effect. The biophysical relationships between the laser parameters and the tissue effects are a topic of current discussion. The biological effect depends not only on the depth of penetration and the scattering but also on other parameters of the laser. For the generation of voluminous coagulation necrosis with a laser in the ca. 800 to 1100 nm wavelength region, a carbonisation of the surface must be avoided. For thermal vaporisation, for example, the Nd:YAG laser with contract-free application or contact tips as well as diode lasers of varying wavelengths are suitable. Especially suitable are the potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser and the lithium triboride (LBO) laser. Ablation is also possible with the Ho:YAG laser. An incision and thus resection or enucleation is also possible with various laser systems including thermal ones, but is more effective with a continuous beam laser of ca. 2000 nm. The Ho:YAG laser achieves an athermal incision the quality of which depends on the pulse energy and the time behaviour of the laser impulse.

benigne Prostatahyperplasie - BPH - Therapie - Lasertherapie - Laserkoagulation - Laservaporisation - Laserinzision - Laserresektion - Laserenukleation

benign prostatic hyperplasia - BPH - therapy - laser therapy - laser coagulation - laser vaporization - laser incision - laser resection - laser enucleation

Literatur

• 1 American Urological Association .Guideline on the management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). (Online) 2003 http://www.auanet.org/guidelines/bph.cfm
• 2 Anson K, Nawrocki J, Buckley J. et al . A multicenter, randomized, prospective study of endoscopic laser ablation versus transurethral resection of the prostate.  Urology. 1995;  46(3) 305-310
• 3 Bach T, Hermann T R, Ganzer R. et al . RevoLix™ vaporesection of the prostate: initial results after 54 patients with an one-year follow-up.  World J Urol. 2007;  25 257-262
• 4 Bachman A, Schürch L, Ruszat R. et al . Photoselective vaporization (PVP) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP): a prospective bi-centre study of perioperative morbidity and early functional outcome.  Eur Urol. 2005;  48 965-972
• 5 Berges R, Dreikorn K, Höfner K. et al .Leitlinien der Deutschen Urologen zur Therapie des Benignen Prostatasyndroms. (Online) 2003 http://www.uni-duesseldorf.de/AWMF/ll/043-035.htm
• 6 Berges R, Muschter R, Höfner K. Alternative, minimalinvasive Therapien beim benignen Prostatasyndrom.  Dtsch Arztebl. 2007;  104(37) A2501-A2510
• 7 Bouchier-Hayes D M. Photoselective vaporization of the prostate: towards a new standard.  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2007;  10 (Suppl 1) S10-S14
• 8 Bouchier-Hayes D M, Anderson P, van Appledorn S. et al . KTP laser versus transurethral resection: early results of a randomized trial.  J Endourol. 2006;  20 580-585
• 9 Böwering R, Weinberg W, Keiditsch E. et al . Experimental investigations of the effect of Nd:YAG laser irradiation on prostatic tissue.  Urol Res. 1980;  8 227
• 10 Briganti A, Naspro R, Gallina A. et al . Impact on sexual function of holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: results of a prospective, 2-center, randomized trial.  J Urol. 2006;  175(5) 1817-1821
• 11 Camey M, Le Duc A. Preliminary study of the action of the YAG laser on canine prostatic adenoma and experimental urethral stenosis.  Eur Urol. 1980;  6 175-179
• 12 Carter A, Sells H, Speakman M. et al . A prospective randomized controlled trial of hybrid laser treatment or transurethral resection of the prostate, with a 1-year follow-up.  BJU Int. 1999;  83(3) 254-259
• 13 Chandrasekar P, Kapasi F, Virdi J. Interstitial laser ablation (Indigo™) of the prostate; a prospective, randomized study, six year results.  J Endourol. 2007;  21 (Suppl 1) A98
• 14 Conrad S, Reek C, Huland H. Visuelle Laserablation. In: Höfner K, Stief CG, Jonas U, eds. Benigne Prostatahyperplasie: Ein Leitfaden für die Praxis. Berlin: Springer 2000: 378-409
• 15 Costello A J, Crowe H R, Jackson T. et al . A randomised single institution study comparing laser prostatectomy and transurethral resection of the prostate.  Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1995;  24(5) 700-704
• 16 Cowles R S III, Kabalin J N, Childs S. et al . A prospective randomized comparison of transurethral resection to visual laser ablation of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.  Urology. 1995;  46(2) 155-160
• 17 Daehlin L, Hedlund H. Interstitial laser coagulation in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms from benign prostatic obstruction: treatment under sedoanalgesia with pressure flow evaluation.  BJU Int. 1999;  84 628-636
• 18 de la Rosette J JMCH, Alivizatos G, Madersbacher S. et al .Guidelines on benign prostatic hyperplasia. (Online) 2006 http://www.uroweb.org/fileadmin/userupload/Guidelines/11 %20BPH.pdf
• 19 de la Rosette J JMCH, Muschter R, Lopez M A. et al . Interstitial laser coagulation in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia using a diode-laser system with temperature feedback.  Br J Urol. 1997;  80 433-438
• 20 de la Rosette J JMHC, Baba S, Badlani G. et al .New minimally invasive and surgical developments in the management of BPO. Chapter 6, pp. 195 – 233. In: McConnell J, Abrams P, Denis L, Khoury S, Roehrborn C, eds. Male Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction, Edition 2006, Health Publications 2006, Distributor EDITIONS 21, Paris 2006 (ISBN 09 546 956 – 6-6)
• 21 Debruyne F M, Djavan B, de la Rosette J. et al .Interventional therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia. In: Chatelain C, Denis L, Foo KT, Khoury S, Mc Connell J, eds. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: Proceedings of the 5th International Consultation on Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH); 25.–28.06.2000; Paris, Frankreich. Plymouth: Health Publication Ltd.; 2001 397-422
• 22 Elzayat E A, Elhilali M M. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): The endourological alternative to open prostatectomy.  Eur Urol. 2006;  49 87-91
• 23 Elzayat E A, Elhilali M M. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): Long-term results, reoperation rate, and possible impact of the learning curve.  Eur Urol. 2007;  52 1465-1472
• 24 Elzayat E A, Habib E I, Elhilali M M. Holmium laser enucleation of prostate for patients in urinary retention.  Urology. 2005;  66(4) 789-793
• 25 Floratos D L, Sonke G S, Francisca E A. et al . Long-term follow-up of laser treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of bladder outlet obstruction.  Urology. 2000;  56 604-609
• 26 Fournier G R Jr, Tewari A, Induhara R. et al . Nd:YAG laser transurethral evaporation of the prostate (TUEP) for urinary retention.  Lasers Surg Med. 1996;  19(4) 480-486
• 27 Fu W J, Hong B F, Wang X X. et al . Evaluation of greenlight photoselective vaporization of the prostate for the treatment of high-risk patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.  Asian J Androl. 2006;  8(3) 367-371
• 28 Gilling P. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.  BJU Int. 2008;  101 131-142
• 29 Gilling P J, Cass C B, Malcolm A. et al . Holmium laser resection of the prostate versus neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet visual laser ablation of the prostate: a randomized prospective comparison of two techniques for laser prostatectomy.  Urology. 1998;  51(4) 573-577
• 30 Gilling P J, Kennett K M, Fraundorfer M R. Holmium laser resection vs transurethral resection of the prostate: results of a randomized trial with 2 years of follow-up.  J Endourol. 2000;  14(9) 757-760
• 31 Gomez S F, Bachmann A, Choi B B. et al . Photoselective vaporization of the prostate (GreenLight PV): lessons learnt after 3500 procedures.  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2007;  10(4) 316-22
• 32 Greenberger M, Steiner M S. The university of tennessee experience with the indigo 830e laser device for the minimally invasive treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: interim analysis.  World J Urol. 1998;  16 386-391
• 33 Gupta N, Kumar S R, Dogra P N. et al . Comparison of standard transurethral resection, transurethral vapour resection and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for managing benign prostatic hyperplasia of > 40 g.  BJU Int. 2006;  97 85-89
• 34 Hai M A, Malek R S. Photoselective vaporization of the prostate: initial experience with a new 80 W KTP laser for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.  J Endourol. 2003;  17 93-96
• 35 Hamann M F, Wild C, Seif C. et al . Funktionelle Ergebnisse nach Laservaporisation mit dem KTP-Laser.  Urologe. 2007;  46 521-527
• 36 Henkel T O, Niedergethmann M, Alken P. Laserinduced interstitial thermotherapy (LITT): in vitro and in vivo studies.  J Endourol. 1995;  9 (Suppl. 1) S56
• 37 Hoffman R M, MacDonald R, Slaton J W. et al . Laser prostatectomy versus transurethral resection for treating benign prostatic obstruction: a systematic review.  J Urol. 2003;  169(1) 210-215
• 38 Hofstetter A G. Hrsg .Laser in der Urologie: Eine Operationslehre. Berlin: Springer 1995
• 39 Horninger W, Janetschek G, Watson G. et al . Are contact laser, interstitial laser, and transurethral ultrasound-guided laser-induced prostatectomy superior to transurethral prostatectomy?.  Prostate. 1997;  31(4) 255-263
• 40 Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen .Nichtmedikamentöse lokale Verfahren zur Behandlung der benignen Prostatahyperplasie: Vorbericht;. Auftrag N04 – 01; Version 1.0 (Online) 2005
• 41 Jung P, Mattelaer P, Wolff J M. et al . Visual laser ablation of the prostate: efficacy evaluated by urodynamics and compared to TURP.  Eur Urol. 1996;  30(4) 418-423
• 42 Kabalin J N, Gill H S, Bite G. et al . Comparative study of laser versus electrocautery prostatic resection: 18-month followup with complex urodynamic assessment.  J Urol. 1995;  153(1) 94-98
• 43 Kaplan S A, Te A E. Transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate: a novel method for treating men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.  Urology. 1995;  45 566-572
• 44 Keoghane S R, Sullivan M E, Doll H A. et al . Five-year data from the Oxford laser prostatectomy trial.  BJU Int. 2000;  86(3) 227-228
• 45 Kim T S, Choi S, Rhew H Y. et al . Comparative study on the treatment outcome and safety of TURP, ILC, TUNA and TEAP for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (Koreanisch).  Korean Journal of Urology. 2006;  47(1) 13-19
• 46 Knoll T, Michel M S, Trojan L. et al . Langzeitergebnisse der interstitiellen Laserkoagulation zur Behandlung der benignen Prostatahyperplasie.  Akt Urol. 2003;  34 48-51
• 47 Krautschick A W, Koehrmann K U, Henkel T O. et al . Interstitial laser coagulation in benign prostatic hyperplasia: a critical evaluation after 2 years of follow-up.  Urol Int. 1999;  62 76-80
• 48 Kuntz R M, Ahyai S, Lehrich K. et al . Transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus transurethral electrocautery resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial in 200 patients.  J Urol. 2004;  172(3) 1012-1016
• 49 Kuntz R M, Lehrich K, Ahyai S A. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates greater than 100 grams: 5-year follow-up results of a randomised clinical trial.  Eur Urol. 2008;  53(1) 160-168
• 50 Kuntz R M, Lehrich K. Transurethral holmium laser enucleation versus transvesical open enucleation for prostate adenoma greater than 100 gm.: a randomized prospective trial of 120 patients.  J Urol. 2002;  168(4) 1465-1469
• 51 Kuntz R M. Current role of lasers in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).  Eur Urol. 2006;  49(6) 961-969
• 52 Kuntz R M. Laser treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.  World J Urol. 2007;  25 241-247
• 53 Kursh E D, Concepcion R, Chan S. et al . Interstitial laser coagulation versus transurethral prostate resection for treating benign prostatic obstruction: a randomized trial with 2-year follow-up.  Urology. 2003;  61(3) 573-578
• 54 Liedberg F, Adell L, Hagberg G, Palmqvist I B. Interstitial laser coagulation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic enlargement: a prospective randomized study.  Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2003;  37(6) 494-497
• 55 Literaturrecherche vom 31.05.2008 .Datenbank: Unabridged Medline 1966 – 2008 (Mai), Suchprogramm: Knowledge Host Browser Gateway, ARIES KG, Langenfeld, Browser: Microsoft Internet Explorer. 
• 56 Madersbacher S, Alivizatos G, Nordling J. et al . EAU 2004 Guidelines on assessment, therapy and follow-up of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (BPH guidelines).  Eur Urol. 2004;  46 547-554
• 57 Martenson A C, de la Rosette J JMC. Interstitial laser coagulation in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia using a diode laser system: results of an evolving technology.  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 1999;  2(3) 148-154
• 58 McAllister W J, Absalom M J, Mir K. et al . Does endoscopic laser ablation of the prostate stand the test of time? Five-year results from a multicentre randomized controlled trial of endoscopic laser ablation against transurethral resection of the prostate.  BJU Int. 2000;  85(4) 437-439
• 59 Minardi D, Galosi A B, Yehia M. et al . Transurethral resection versus minimally invasive treatments of benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of treatments; our experience.  Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2004;  76(1) 11-18
• 60 Monoski M A, Gonzalez R R, Sandhu J S. et al . Urodynamic predictors of outcomes with photoselective laser vaporization prostatectomy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and preoperative retention.  Urology. 2006;  68(2) 312-317
• 61 Montorsi F, Naspro R, Salonia A. et al . Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: results from a 2-center prospective, randomized trial in patients with obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia.  J Urol. 2004;  172 1926-1929
• 62 Moody J A, Lingeman J E. Holmium laser resection for prostate adenoma greater than 100gm: comparison to open prostatectomy.  J Urol. 2001;  165 459-462
• 63 Mottet N, Anidjar M, Bourdon O. et al . Randomized comparison of transurethral electroresection and holmium: YAG laser vaporization for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia.  J Endourol. 1999;  13(2) 127-130
• 64 Muschter R, Gilling P. Lasers for Median Lobe Hyperplasia.  Curr Urol Rep. 2001;  2 306-310
• 65 Muschter R, Hofstetter A. Die interstitielle Laserkoagulation mit dem Diodenlaser der Wellenlänge 830 nm zur Therapie der benignen Prostatahyperplasie – High- versus Low-Volume-Koagulation.  Lasermedizin. 2000;  15 72-80
• 66 Muschter R, Perlmutter A P. The optimization of laser prostatectomy; part II: other lasing techniques.  Urology. 1994;  44(6) 856-861
• 67 Muschter R. Current status of laser treatment of BPH. Med.  Laser Appl.. 2001;  16 5-14
• 68 Muschter R. Free-beam and contact laser coagulation.  J Endourol. 2003;  17 579-585
• 69 Narayan P, Tewari A, Aboseif S. et al . A randomized study comparing visual laser ablation and transurethral evaporation of prostate in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.  J Urol. 1995;  154(6) 2083-2088
• 70 Naspro R, Suardi N, Salonia A. et al . Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy > 70 g: 24-month follow-up.  Eur Urol. 2006;  50 563-568
• 71 Neill M G, Gilling P J, Kennett K M. et al . Randomized trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of prostate with plasmakinetic enucleation of prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.  Urology. 2006;  68(5) 1020-1024
• 72 Norby B, Nielsen H V, Frimodt-Moller P C. Transurethral interstitial laser coagulation of the prostate and transurethral microwave thermotherapy vs transurethral resection or incision of the prostate: results of a randomized, controlled study in patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia.  BJU Int. 2002;  90(9) 853-862
• 73 Oelke M. Leitlinien der Deutschen Urologen zur Therapie des benignen Prostatasyndroms (BPS).  Urologe A. 2003;  42(5) 722-738
• 74 Rassweiler J, Roder M, Schulze M. et al . Transurethrale Laserenukleation der Prostata mit dem Holmiumlaser. Wie viel Leistung ist notwendig?.  Urologe. 2008;  47 441-448
• 75 Reich O, Bachmann A, Siebels M. et al . High power (80 W) potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization of the prostate in 66 high risk patients.  J Urol. 2005;  173 158-160
• 76 Reich O, Corvin S, Oberneder R. et al . In vitro comparison of transurethral vaporization of the prostate (TUVP), resection of the prostate (TURP), and vaporization-resection of the prostate (TUVRP).  Urol Res. 2002;  30 15-20
• 77 Reich O, Gratzke C, Stief C G. Techniques and Long-Term Results of Surgical Procedures for BPH.  Eur Urol. 2006;  49(6) 970-978
• 78 Roehrborn C G, McConnell J D, Barry M J. et al .Guideline on the Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). 2003 Updated 2006 (Online) http://www.auanet.org/guidelines/bph.cfm
• 79 Salonia A, Suardi N, Naspro R. et al . Holmium laser enucleation versus open prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: an inpatient cost analysis.  Urology. 2006;  68(2) 302-306
• 80 Schatzl G, Madersbacher S, Djavan B. et al . Two-year results of transurethral resection of the prostate versus four “less invasive” treatment options.  Eur Urol. 2000;  37(6) 695-701
• 81 Schatzl G, Madersbacher S, Lang T. et al . The early postoperative morbidity of transurethral resection of the prostate and of 4 minimally invasive treatment alternatives.  J Urol. 1997;  158(1) 105-111
• 82 Seitz M, Ackermann A, Gratzke C. et al . Der Dioden-Laser. Ex-vivo-Untersuchungen zu den Vaporisations- und Koagulationseigenschaften.  Urologe. 2007;  46 1242-1247
• 83 Seitz M, Reich O, Karl A. et al . Diode laser treatment of human prostates – clinical 6-month experience.  Med Laser Appl. 2007;  22 232-237
• 84 Seitz M, Sroka R, Gratzke C. et al . The diode laser: A novel side-firing approach for laser vaporisation of the human prostate – immediate efficacy and 1-year follow-up.  Eur Urol. 2007;  52 1717-1722
• 85 Shah H, Mahajan A P, Sodha H S. et al . Prospective evaluation of the learning curve for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.  J Urol. 2007;  177 1468-1474
• 86 Shah H M, Mahajan A P, Sunil S S. et al . Peri-operative complications of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: experience in the first 280 patients, and a review of the literature.  BJU Int. 2007;  100 94-101
• 87 Shanberg A m, Tansey L A, Baghdassarian R. The use of the neodymium YAG laser in prostatotomy.  J Urol. 1985;  133 331A
• 88 Shingleton W B, Kolski J, Renfroe D L. et al . Electrovaporization of the prostate versus laser ablation of the prostate in men with benign prostatic hypertrophy: a pressure-flow analysis.  Urol Int. 1998;  60(4) 224-228
• 89 Shingleton W B, Terrell F, Renfroe D L. et al . A randomized prospective study of laser ablation of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.  Urology. 1999;  54(6) 1017-1021
• 90 Sroka R, Ackermann A, Tilki D. et al . In-vitro comparison of the tissue vaporisation capabilities of different lasers.  Med Laser Appl. 2007;  22 227-231
• 91 Sroka R, Perlmutter A P, Martin T. et al . LITT on canine prostates: an in-vivo study to compare the effects of different wavelengths.  SPIE Proc. 1996;  2671 335-338
• 92 Sulser T, Reich O, Wyler S. et al . Photoselective KTP laser vaporization of the prostate: first experiences with 65 procedures.  J Endourol. 2004 Dec;  18(10) 976-981
• 93 Suvakovic N, Hindmarsh J R. A step towards day case prostatectomy.  Br J Urol. 1996;  77(2) 212-214
• 94 Tan A HH, Liao C, Mo Z. et al . Meta-analysis of holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for symptomatic prostatic obstruction.  Br J Surg. 2007;  94(10) 1201-1208
• 95 Tan A HH, Gilling P J. Holmium laser prostatectomy: current techniques.  Urology. 2002;  60(1) 152-156
• 96 Tan A HH, Gilling P J, Kennet K M. et al . A randomized trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate with transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of bladder outlet obstruction secondary to benign hyperplasia large glands (40 to 200 grams).  J Urol. 2003;  170 1270-1274
• 97 Tan A HH, Gilling P J, Kennett K. et al . Long term results of the high powered holmium laser for vaporisation (ablation) of the prostate: results at 7 years.  BJU Int. 2003;  92 707-709
• 98 Tan A HH, Gilling P J. Free-beam and contact laser soft-tissue ablation in urology.  J Endourol. 2003;  17 587-593
• 99 Tooher R, Sutherland P, Costello A. et al . A systematic review of holmium laser prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia.  J Urol. 2004;  171(5) 1773-1781
• 100 Tuhkanen K, Heino A, Aaltomaa S. et al . Long-term results of contact laser versus transurethral resection of the prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with small or moderately enlarged prostates.  Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2003;  37(6) 487-493
• 101 Tuhkanen K, Heino A, Alaopas M. Hybrid laser treatment compared with transurethral resection of the prostate for symptomatic bladder outlet obstruction caused by a large benign prostate: a prospective, randomized trial with a 6-month follow-up.  BJU Int. 1999;  84(7) 805-809
• 102 van Melick H H, van Venrooij G E, Boon T A. Long-term follow-up after transurethral resection of the prostate, contact laser prostatectomy, and electrovaporization.  Urology. 2003;  62(6) 1029-1034
• 103 van Melick H H, van Venrooij G E, Eckhardt M D. et al . A randomized controlled trial comparing transurethral resection of the prostate, contact laser prostatectomy and electrovaporization in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: analysis of subjective changes, morbidity and mortality.  J Urol. 2003;  169(4) 1411-1416
• 104 Watson G. Contact laser prostatectomy.  World J Urol. 1995;  13(2) 115-118
• 105 Wendt-Nordahl G, Huckele S, Honeck P. et al . 980 nm diode laser: A novel laser technology for vaporisation of the prostate.  Eur Urol. 2007;  52 1723-1728
• 106 Westenberg A, Gilling P S, Kennett K. et al . Holmium laser resection of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate: results of a randomized trial with 4-year minimum long-term followup.  J Urol. 2004;  172(2) 616-619
• 107 Wilson L C, Gilling P J, Williams A. et al . A randomised trial comparing holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection in the treatment of prostates larger than 40 grams: results at 2 years.  Eur Urol. 2006;  50(3) 569-573
• 108 Xia S J, Zhuo J, Sun X W. et al . Thulium laser versus standard transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial.  Eur Urol. 2008;  53 382-390
• 109 Zellner M, Muschter R. Initiale urodynamische Ergebnisse nach interstitieller Laserkoagulation der Prostata bei benigner Hyperplasie.  Lasermedizin. 1994;  10 179-182
• 110 Zorn B H, Bauer J J, Ruiz H E. et al . Randomized trial of safety and efficacy of transurethral resection of the prostate using contact laser versus electrocautery.  Tech Urol. 1999;  5(4) 198-201

1 Der Begriff der „Photoselektiven Vaporisation” beschreibt im Falle des 532-nm-Lasers den Prozess der Absorption dieser Wellenlänge durch Hämoglobin. Grundsätzlich kann dieser Terminus allerdings auf jede beliebige Paarung aus starker Absorption durch einen natürlichen Körperfarbstoff und der entsprechenden Laserwellenlänge angewendet werden – z. B. auch Wasser und 2 oder 3 µm.

2 Gilt nur für Holmiumlaser, der Zahlenwert hängt vom erwärmten Volumen ab, das wiederum bei ausreichend kurzer Pulsdauer vom Absorptionskoeffizienten der jeweiligen Wellenlänge bzw. von der Eindringtiefe bei der verwendeten Laserwellenlänge abhängt.

3 Mit der Verfärbung kommt es auch zu einer dramatischen Änderung der optischen Eigenschaften und damit auch zur Absorption für sichtbare Wellenlängen.